Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Competing creditor claims and loan recoverability: evidence from anti-recharacterization laws

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Abstract

Anti-recharacterization laws significantly increase the rights of securitization creditors by allowing the buyers of securitized assets to exclusively and immediately seize collateral in bankruptcy. However, strengthening the rights of securitization creditors can limit other creditors’ ability to recover loans. We find that, after a state adopts an anti-recharacterization law, local banks operating in the same state accrue more loan loss provisions, tighten their loan contracts, and incur higher future loan charge-offs. These findings are consistent with the argument that a safe harbor for securitization transactions advantages Wall Street-style structured finance at the expense of Main Street-style lending.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages39
JournalReview of Accounting Studies
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 28 Aug 2026

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth
    SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth

User-Defined Keywords

  • Creditor rights
  • Competing creditor claims
  • Securitization
  • Recharacterization
  • Loan loss provisions
  • Anti-recharacterization laws

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Competing creditor claims and loan recoverability: evidence from anti-recharacterization laws'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this