TY - JOUR
T1 - Community solar energy initiatives in urban energy transitions
T2 - A comparative study of Foshan, China and Seoul, South Korea
AU - MAH, Daphne Ngar-yin
N1 - Funding Information:
The author would like to thank the Research Grant Committee of the HKSAR Government’s General Research Fund (Project titled “Deliberative participation, trust, and social learning for sustainable energy transitions (SETs): A comparative study of Japan, South Korea, and China” – Project No. HKBU 12602717 ), Policy Innovation and Co-ordination Office of HKSAR Government’s Public Policy Research Grant (Project titled: Engaging the community to develop a model for sustainable energy futures: A case study of two prospective solar communities in Hong Kong” – Project No. 2017.A2.027.18B ), the Hong Kong Baptist University’s Social Sciences Faculty Research Grant (project titled “The diversity and critical processes of urban energy transitions through community engagement: An international comparison of London, Freiburg (Germany), New York City, Tokyo, Seoul, Hong Kong and Foshan (China)” – Project No. FRG2/17-18/09 6), and the University College London’s Bartlett Synergy Grant (Project titled “Urban energy innovation and transitions in China: typologies, spatial patterns, and casual mechanisms” for the funding support.
PY - 2019/4
Y1 - 2019/4
N2 - Urban community solar energy initiatives have flourished around the world, suggesting that community energy can be an important pathway for energy transitions. The deployment of solar energy has however remained limited. The complexity of these community-level transition processes has not been well understood and conceptualised. By advancing studies on community energy and socio-technical energy transitions, this paper proposes an integrated framework to conceptualise community-level energy initiatives from a systemic perspective. The framework builds the linkages among five critical processes and their associated contexts and outcomes, and is applied in a comparative study of two cities in Asia: Foshan and Seoul. Based on 19 semi-structured interviews in the case cities, this study has three major findings. First, the two cities’ solarisation pathways exhibited similarities as well as differences that could be understood within our conceptual framework. Second, distinctive modes of community solarisation can be identified in the two cities. Foshan was a mixed mode which was characterised by a combination of top-down, state-led and entrepreneur-driven approaches, whereas Seoul developed a bottom-up grassroot-driven transition. Third, the actual impacts of community solarisation on regime shifts appeared to be very modest, but we identify important reinforcing effects between some processes and local contextual factors. This paper concludes that community energy can play an important role in urban energy transitions, but that sufficient policy attention must be given to complex interactions in the critical processes.
AB - Urban community solar energy initiatives have flourished around the world, suggesting that community energy can be an important pathway for energy transitions. The deployment of solar energy has however remained limited. The complexity of these community-level transition processes has not been well understood and conceptualised. By advancing studies on community energy and socio-technical energy transitions, this paper proposes an integrated framework to conceptualise community-level energy initiatives from a systemic perspective. The framework builds the linkages among five critical processes and their associated contexts and outcomes, and is applied in a comparative study of two cities in Asia: Foshan and Seoul. Based on 19 semi-structured interviews in the case cities, this study has three major findings. First, the two cities’ solarisation pathways exhibited similarities as well as differences that could be understood within our conceptual framework. Second, distinctive modes of community solarisation can be identified in the two cities. Foshan was a mixed mode which was characterised by a combination of top-down, state-led and entrepreneur-driven approaches, whereas Seoul developed a bottom-up grassroot-driven transition. Third, the actual impacts of community solarisation on regime shifts appeared to be very modest, but we identify important reinforcing effects between some processes and local contextual factors. This paper concludes that community energy can play an important role in urban energy transitions, but that sufficient policy attention must be given to complex interactions in the critical processes.
KW - China
KW - Community solar energy
KW - South Korea
KW - Urban socio-technical transitions
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058156952&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.erss.2018.11.011
DO - 10.1016/j.erss.2018.11.011
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85058156952
SN - 2214-6296
VL - 50
SP - 129
EP - 142
JO - Energy Research and Social Science
JF - Energy Research and Social Science
ER -