Communication-oriented language teaching: Where are we now? Where do we go from here?

William Littlewood*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

97 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In its early days, CLT was widely promoted as suitable for all contexts, but many questions have since been raised about what it really means and what versions of it (if any) are suited to specific learning situations. Experiences in Asia, where educational traditions and current realities often contrast strongly with those where CLT originated, have provided a major impetus for this questioning and the process has been reinforced by developments in the wider context, such as the postmethod perspective in language teaching and the decline of centre-to-periphery conceptions of modernization. CLT now serves not so much as a label for a specific approach as an umbrella term to describe all approaches that aim to develop communicative competence in personally meaningful ways. It also provides a framework for defining issues that research and exploratory practice need to address in the years ahead.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)349-362
Number of pages14
JournalLanguage Teaching
Volume47
Issue number3
Early online date12 Apr 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2014

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Communication-oriented language teaching: Where are we now? Where do we go from here?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this