Commentary: Do not force agreement: A response to Krippendorff (2016)

Guangchao Charles Feng; Xinshu ZHAO

doi:10.1027/1614-2241/a000120

Commentary: Do not force agreement: A response to Krippendorff (2016)

Guangchao Charles Feng^*, Xinshu ZHAO

^*Corresponding author for this work

Department of Communication Studies

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	145-148
Number of pages	4
Journal	Methodology
Volume	12
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241/a000120
Publication status	Published - Oct 2016

Scopus Subject Areas

Social Sciences(all)
Psychology(all)

Access to Document

10.1027/1614-2241/a000120

Full Text

Cite this

@article{1edbf7f13db54bd1938d5e9dc049c692,

title = "Commentary: Do not force agreement: A response to Krippendorff (2016)",

author = "Feng, {Guangchao Charles} and Xinshu ZHAO",

year = "2016",

month = oct,

doi = "10.1027/1614-2241/a000120",

language = "English",

volume = "12",

pages = "145--148",

journal = "Methodology",

issn = "1614-1881",

publisher = "Hogrefe Publishing",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Commentary

T2 - Do not force agreement: A response to Krippendorff (2016)

AU - Feng, Guangchao Charles

AU - ZHAO, Xinshu

PY - 2016/10

Y1 - 2016/10

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85002988617&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1027/1614-2241/a000120

DO - 10.1027/1614-2241/a000120

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:85002988617

VL - 12

SP - 145

EP - 148

JO - Methodology

JF - Methodology

SN - 1614-1881

IS - 4

ER -

Commentary: Do not force agreement: A response to Krippendorff (2016)

Scopus Subject Areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this