Abstract
Redstone (Democracy and the Problem of Certainty. Theory and Society, 2024) provides a welcomed discussion of our general psychological propensity to become overly sure of our convictions and to thereby avoid critical thinking about them. Her analysis helps us to better understand the sources of this cognitive bias and its impact on sociology which has become overly ideological. This cognitive bias is also inconsistent with Merton’s norms of science. Excessive ideological commitments and related cognitive bias are impeding the development of cumulative sociological knowledge.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 19–21 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | Theory and Society |
| Volume | 54 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Feb 2025 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
User-Defined Keywords
- Cognitive bias
- Ideology
- Research methods
- Science
- Sociology of knowledge
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Comment on Redstone’s “Democracy and the problem of certainty”'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver