Comment on Redstone’s “Democracy and the problem of certainty”

Arthur Sakamoto*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Abstract

Redstone (Democracy and the Problem of Certainty. Theory and Society, 2024) provides a welcomed discussion of our general psychological propensity to become overly sure of our convictions and to thereby avoid critical thinking about them. Her analysis helps us to better understand the sources of this cognitive bias and its impact on sociology which has become overly ideological. This cognitive bias is also inconsistent with Merton’s norms of science. Excessive ideological commitments and related cognitive bias are impeding the development of cumulative sociological knowledge.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)19–21
Number of pages3
JournalTheory and Society
Volume54
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2025

User-Defined Keywords

  • Cognitive bias
  • Ideology
  • Research methods
  • Science
  • Sociology of knowledge

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comment on Redstone’s “Democracy and the problem of certainty”'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this