Come together? The unusual combination of precariat materialist and educated post-materialist support for an Australian Universal Basic Income

Roger Patulny*, Ben Spies-Butcher

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Abstract

International studies using the European Social Survey (ESS) reveal higher support for Universal Basic Income (UBI) in poorer countries with less generous welfare systems, and among individuals with lower income and education, and leftist political leanings. We present data from the 2019−20 Australian Survey of Social Attitudes mirroring the ESS question. Australia falls in the middle of European opinion, with 51% supporting a UBI, increasing slightly during the onset of Covid-19. We also find higher support among two different groups: (1) those facing greater ‘material’ precarity, including younger, low-income, unemployed, suburban renters, and (2) those who have more post-materialist concerns, including Green-left voters and those favouring redistributive values. Unlike in other countries, higher education predicts more support, while homeownership predicts less. The article concludes with challenges to introducing UBI to Australia, including potentially contradictory strategies for different support bases (material vs post-material), ongoing commitments to means-testing, and negative framing in the media.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)894-913
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Sociology
Volume59
Issue number4
Early online date11 May 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2023

Scopus Subject Areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

User-Defined Keywords

  • education
  • materialist
  • post-materialist
  • surveys
  • Universal Basic Income

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Come together? The unusual combination of precariat materialist and educated post-materialist support for an Australian Universal Basic Income'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this