Combined effects of individual and neighbourhood socioeconomic status on older adults' mortality: A retrospective follow-up study in Hong Kong

Yingqi Guo, Kristy Shuk Ting Chan, Chee Hon Chan, Qingsong Chang, Ruby S.Y. Lee, Paul Siu Fai Yip*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Objectives This study examined the interaction effects of individual and neighbourhood socioeconomic status (SES) in older adults in Hong Kong, considering all-cause and cause-specific mortality from respiratory disease, cancer, cardiovascular diseases, ischaemic heart disease, stroke, nonmedical disease and suicide. Design A retrospective follow-up study. Setting Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, a rapidly ageing society with 16.1% residents aged 65 years or older in 2020. Participants 43 910 people aged 65 years or older were enrolled at baseline. They had participated in health check-ups during 2000-2003 in one of the Elderly Health Centres. Observation periods started on the date of the participant's first health check-up, and ended at death, or 31 December 2011, whichever occurred first. Outcome measures All-cause and cause-specific mortality over the study timeframe. Analysis Cox's proportional hazards regression models were applied to estimate the adjusted HRs of mortality, by including covariates at neighbourhood (deprivation) and individual levels (poverty, education and type of housing). Results The â double tragedy theory' (ie, lower SES persons living in lower SES neighbourhoods have worst health outcomes) was more related to cancer, while the â psychosocial comparison theory' (ie, lower SES persons living in higher SES neighbourhoods have poorer health outcomes) was more related to cardiovascular, ischaemic heart disease, and stroke. Conclusion There were important interaction effects between neighbourhood and individual factors on mortality. Policies based on the interaction between individual and neighbourhood SES should be considered. For instance, for cancer, targeted services (ie, free consultation, relevant treatment information, health check-up, etc) could be allocated in socioeconomically deprived areas to support individuals with low SES. On the other hand, more free public services to reduce psychological stresses (ie, psychological support services, recreational services, health knowledge information, etc) could be provided for those individuals with low SES living in higher SES areas to reduce stroke, cardiovascular and ischaemic heart diseases. ©
    Original languageEnglish
    Article numbere043192
    JournalBMJ Open
    Volume11
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Apr 2021

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Combined effects of individual and neighbourhood socioeconomic status on older adults' mortality: A retrospective follow-up study in Hong Kong'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this