TY - JOUR
T1 - Cognitive abilities are associated with specific conjunctions of structural and functional neural subnetworks
AU - Kristanto, Daniel
AU - Hildebrandt, Andrea
AU - Sommer, Werner
AU - Zhou, Changsong
N1 - Funding Information:
Data were provided by the Human Connectome Project, WU-Minn Consortium (Principal Investigators: David Van Essen and Kamil Ugurbil; 1U54MH091657) funded by the 16 NIH Institutes and Centers that support the NIH Blueprint for Neuroscience Research; and by the McDonnell Center for Systems Neuroscience at Washington University. This research was supported by the Hong Kong Research Grant Council (RGC) (HKBU12301019), Hong Kong Baptist University, Research Committee, Initiation Grant - Faculty Niche Research Areas (IG-FNRA) 2020/21, and the German Research Foundation (DFG) to Andrea Hildebrandt (HI 1780/7–1) and Carsten Gießing (GI 682/5–1) as part of the DFG priority program "META-REP: A Meta-scientific Programme to analyse and optimise Replicability in the Behavioural, Social, and Cognitive Sciences" (SPP 2317).
Publisher copyright:
© 2023 The Authors.
PY - 2023/10/1
Y1 - 2023/10/1
N2 - Cognitive neuroscience assumes that different mental abilities correspond to at least partly separable brain subnetworks and strives to understand their relationships. However, single-task approaches typically revealed multiple brain subnetworks to be involved in performance. Here, we chose a bottom-up approach of investigating the association between structural and functional brain subnetworks, on the one hand, and domain-specific cognitive abilities, on the other. Structural network was identified using machine-learning graph neural network by clustering anatomical brain properties measured in 838 individuals enroled in the WU-Minn Young Adult Human Connectome Project. Functional network was adapted from seven Resting State Networks (7-RSN). We then analyzed the results of 15 cognitive tasks and estimated five latent abilities: fluid reasoning (Gf), crystallized intelligence (Gc), memory (Mem), executive functions (EF), and processing speed (Gs). In a final step we determined linear associations between these independently identified ability and brain entities. We found no one-to-one mapping between latent abilities and brain subnetworks. Analyses revealed that abilities are associated with properties of particular combinations of brain subnetworks. While some abilities are more strongly associated to within-subnetwork connections, others are related with connections between multiple subnetworks. Importantly, domain-specific abilities commonly rely on node(s) as hub(s) to connect with other subnetworks. To test the robustness of our findings, we ran the analyses through several defensible analytical decisions. Together, the present findings allow a novel perspective on the distinct nature of domain-specific cognitive abilities building upon unique combinations of associated brain subnetworks.
AB - Cognitive neuroscience assumes that different mental abilities correspond to at least partly separable brain subnetworks and strives to understand their relationships. However, single-task approaches typically revealed multiple brain subnetworks to be involved in performance. Here, we chose a bottom-up approach of investigating the association between structural and functional brain subnetworks, on the one hand, and domain-specific cognitive abilities, on the other. Structural network was identified using machine-learning graph neural network by clustering anatomical brain properties measured in 838 individuals enroled in the WU-Minn Young Adult Human Connectome Project. Functional network was adapted from seven Resting State Networks (7-RSN). We then analyzed the results of 15 cognitive tasks and estimated five latent abilities: fluid reasoning (Gf), crystallized intelligence (Gc), memory (Mem), executive functions (EF), and processing speed (Gs). In a final step we determined linear associations between these independently identified ability and brain entities. We found no one-to-one mapping between latent abilities and brain subnetworks. Analyses revealed that abilities are associated with properties of particular combinations of brain subnetworks. While some abilities are more strongly associated to within-subnetwork connections, others are related with connections between multiple subnetworks. Importantly, domain-specific abilities commonly rely on node(s) as hub(s) to connect with other subnetworks. To test the robustness of our findings, we ran the analyses through several defensible analytical decisions. Together, the present findings allow a novel perspective on the distinct nature of domain-specific cognitive abilities building upon unique combinations of associated brain subnetworks.
KW - Brain Cognition Associations
KW - Brain Network
KW - Cognitive Abilities
KW - Executive Functions
KW - Functional Brain Networks
KW - Individual Differences
KW - Intelligence
KW - Neuroanatomy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85166978993&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120304
DO - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120304
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 37536528
AN - SCOPUS:85166978993
SN - 1053-8119
VL - 279
JO - NeuroImage
JF - NeuroImage
M1 - 120304
ER -