Abstract
By combining computer-assisted quantitative linguistic analysis and critical discourse analysis, this study compares Twitter discussions on climate change and global warming within a decade, to investigate the convergence or divergence of distribution of key concepts and embeddedness of moral judgements according to the moral foundation theory. Results show that the two topics varied a lot in the semantic categories of keywords, but their distinction in moral expression was smaller.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Publication status | Published - Aug 2024 |
| Event | Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication (AEJMC) 2024 107th Annual Conference: Representation and Voice — The Future of Democracy - Philadelphia Marriott Downtown, Philadelphia, United States Duration: 8 Aug 2024 → 11 Aug 2024 https://community.aejmc.org/conference/home (Link to conference website) https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/68765644/24aejmcconferenceprogram073124 (Link to conference programme) https://community.aejmc.org/conference/paper-competition/paperabstracts (Link to conference paper abstract) |
Conference
| Conference | Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication (AEJMC) 2024 107th Annual Conference |
|---|---|
| Country/Territory | United States |
| City | Philadelphia |
| Period | 8/08/24 → 11/08/24 |
| Internet address |
|
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 13 Climate Action
User-Defined Keywords
- Climate Change
- Global Warming
- Social Media Discourse
- Corpus-assisted Discourse Analysis
- Moral Foundation Theory
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '“Climate Change” vs. “Global Warming”: A Corpus-assisted Discourse Analysis of Climate Change Discussion on Twitter'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver