Chinese migrant factory workers across four decades: shifts in work conditions, urbanization, and family strategies

Jonathan Unger, Kaxton Y SIU

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

    15 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Today about 90 million urban Chinese factory workers are migrant workers from the countryside, comprising the largest and most rapidly expanded industrial working class in history. Before the mid-2000s, these workers from the countryside were employed only temporarily in factories, and almost all were young, very poorly paid and exploited. But as labor shortages have developed and as restrictions against residing in China’s cities have relaxed, they are not as vulnerable as they were in previous decades. More of them are older, married, and have children, and many of them would like to settle on a permanent basis near their workplace with their families. Drawing on three decades of on-site interview research up through November 2018, the authors examine the changes that have occurred and the obstacles – such as the remaining difficulty of obtaining an affordable urban education for their children – that still stand in the way of migrant Chinese families remaining intact and settling permanently in urban areas. As a means of conceptualizing the implications of the shifts in migrant workers’ circumstances, especially for work relations and labor disputes, their evolving situation will be analyzed through the paradigm of Albert O. Hirschman’s concept of Exit vs. Voice.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)765-778
    Number of pages14
    JournalLabor History
    Volume60
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Nov 2019

    User-Defined Keywords

    • China
    • factory workers
    • migrants
    • labor history
    • urbanization

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Chinese migrant factory workers across four decades: shifts in work conditions, urbanization, and family strategies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this