Chinese individualization, revisited

Jack BARBALET*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The article critically examines the application of the individualization thesis to China. Factors presented in support of the case for Chinese individualization are shown to be either ambiguous or, on examination, counter-indicators. Family transformations from the Mao period to the present maintain family obligation. Labour migration, rather than leading to individualization expresses family commitment. Rights awareness similarly provides no clear evidence of individualization while rural and labour struggles around collective rights do not support the thesis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)9-23
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Sociology
Volume52
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2016

Scopus Subject Areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

User-Defined Keywords

  • collective rights
  • family obligation
  • kinship and business
  • labour migration
  • party-state

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Chinese individualization, revisited'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this