TY - JOUR
T1 - China's grain marketing system reform in 1993-1994
T2 - Empirical evidence from a rural household survey
AU - Cheng, Yuk Shing
N1 - Funding Information:
The financial support of the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research is gratefully acknowledged.T he authorh as benefittedf rom the helpful and constructivec om-ments from particpantsi n the conferenceo n “Grain Market Reform in China” at the East-West Centre, Honolulu, September,1 995.
PY - 1996/9
Y1 - 1996/9
N2 - By utilizing a rural household survey, this paper domonstrates the progress in China's grain marketing reform in 1993 and evaluates to what extent the reform was reversed in 1994. Specifically, we investigate the degree of commercialization, changes in state's contract procurement quota and changes in the marketing channels. Overall, the grain market has been liberalized to a very large extent. Participation of the private traders have already grown to a significant level, occupying more than one-third of the market share for wheat and rice and more than half for maize. For minor crops, the share of private traders were even bigger. Despite the reversal in 1994, the grain market was still very "open." Counting all grain types, the state was controlling only about one-third of the marketed surplus. However, if the central leadership perceived any serious instability in the market for a certain grain, examples provided illustrate how the state's control could certainly be strengthened significantly.
AB - By utilizing a rural household survey, this paper domonstrates the progress in China's grain marketing reform in 1993 and evaluates to what extent the reform was reversed in 1994. Specifically, we investigate the degree of commercialization, changes in state's contract procurement quota and changes in the marketing channels. Overall, the grain market has been liberalized to a very large extent. Participation of the private traders have already grown to a significant level, occupying more than one-third of the market share for wheat and rice and more than half for maize. For minor crops, the share of private traders were even bigger. Despite the reversal in 1994, the grain market was still very "open." Counting all grain types, the state was controlling only about one-third of the marketed surplus. However, if the central leadership perceived any serious instability in the market for a certain grain, examples provided illustrate how the state's control could certainly be strengthened significantly.
KW - Q13
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0042093350&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S1043-951X(96)90005-X
DO - 10.1016/S1043-951X(96)90005-X
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:0042093350
SN - 1043-951X
VL - 7
SP - 135
EP - 153
JO - China Economic Review
JF - China Economic Review
IS - 2
ER -