Behavioral economics and monetary wisdom: A cross-level analysis of monetary aspiration, pay (dis)satisfaction, risk perception, and corruption in 32 nations

Thomas Li Ping Tang, Zhen Li, Mehmet Ferhat Özbek, Vivien Kim Geok Lim, Thompson Sian Hin Teo, Mahfooz A. Ansari, Toto Sutarso, Ilya E. Garber, Randy Ki Kwan Chiu, Brigitte Charles-Pauvers, Caroline Urbain, Roberto Luna-Arocas, Jingqiu Chen, Ningyu Tang, Theresa Li Na Tang, Fernando Arias-Galicia, Consuelo Garcia De La Torre, Peter Vlerick, Adebowale Akande, Abdulqawi Salim Al-ZubaidiAli Mahdi Kazem, Mark G. Borg, Bor Shiuan Cheng, Linzhi Du, Abdul Hamid Safwat Ibrahim, Kilsun Kim, Eva Malovics, Richard T. Mpoyi, Obiajulu Anthony Ugochukwu Nnedum, Elisaveta Gjorgji Sardžoska, Michael W. Allen, Rosário Correia, Chin Kang Jen, Alice S. Moreira, Johnston E. Osagie, AAhad M. Osman-Gani, Ruja Pholsward, Marko Polic, Petar Skobic, Allen F. Stembridge, Luigina Canova, Anna Maria Manganelli, Adrian H. Pitariu, Francisco José Costa Pereira

    Research output: Chapter in book/report/conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

    Abstract

    Corruption involves greed, money, and risky decision-making. We explore the love of money, pay satisfaction, probability of risk, and dishonesty across cultures. Avaricious monetary aspiration breeds unethicality. Prospect theory frames decisions in the gains–losses domain and high–low probability. Pay dissatisfaction (in the losses) excites dishonesty in the name of justice at the individual level. Corruption Perceptions Index, CPI, signals a high–low probability of getting caught for dishonesty at the country level. We theorize: Decision-makers adopt avaricious love of money aspiration as a lens and frame dishonesty in the gains–losses domain (pay satisfaction–dissatisfaction, Level 1) and high–low probability (CPI, Level 2) to maximize expected utility and ultimate serenity. We challenge the myth: Pay satisfaction curbs dishonesty across nations consistently. Cross-level three-dimensional visualization demonstrates (6500 managers in 32 countries across six continents): With high aspiration, pay dissatisfaction excites the highest- (third-highest) avaricious justice-seeking dishonesty in high (medium) CPI nations; pay satisfaction provokes the second-highest avaricious opportunity-seizing dishonesty in low CPI entities—maximizing expected utility. Low aspiration and high pay satisfaction consistently create low dishonesty—achieving ultimate serenity. We expand prospect theory from a micro and individual-level theory to a cross-level theory of monetary wisdom across 32 nations, providing novel insights to business ethics, the environment, and responsibility.

    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationMonetary Wisdom
    Subtitle of host publicationMonetary Aspirations Impact Decision-Making
    EditorsThomas Li-Ping Tang
    PublisherElsevier
    Chapter10
    Pages215-237
    Number of pages23
    Edition1st
    ISBN (Electronic)9780443154546
    ISBN (Print)9780443154539
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 16 May 2024

    Scopus Subject Areas

    • General Psychology

    User-Defined Keywords

    • Attitude
    • Avaricious monetary aspiration
    • Behavioral economics
    • Common method variance
    • Control
    • Corruption
    • Country level
    • CPI
    • Cross-cultural
    • Cross-level analysis
    • Dishonesty
    • Environmental context
    • Equity perceptions
    • Gains–losses
    • Global
    • Greedy desires
    • High–low probability of risk
    • Intention
    • International
    • Justice
    • Level 1
    • Level 2
    • Love of money attitude
    • Measurement invariance
    • Monetary wisdom
    • Pay satisfaction–dissatisfaction
    • Prospect theory
    • Risk-aversion
    • Risk-taking
    • S Curve
    • Social norms
    • The certainty effect
    • The possibility effect
    • Theory of planned behavior
    • TPB
    • Transparency
    • Unethicality
    • Wrongdoing

    Cite this