Abstract
This study examines discourses in Chinese online discussions of gene editing by multiple social actors on Weibo before and after a significant scientific crisis, the 2018 scandal of Chinese gene-edited human babies. A content analysis of 2074 posts was done to identify frames, emotions, and metaphors. Findings reveal that Chinese social media have opened up new spaces for multiple social actors to generate multiple discourses. This has resulted in a more participatory public engagement with science and technology on Chinese social media, potentially influencing the online agenda and policy decisions on science and technology. Finally, findings indicate that a scientific crisis can serve as a trigger for significant changes in public attitudes and opinions regarding gene editing.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 570-587 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Public Understanding of Science |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| Early online date | 19 Jan 2021 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jul 2021 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
User-Defined Keywords
- discourse
- emotion
- gene editing
- public engagement with science
- scientific crisis
- social media
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Before and after the Chinese gene-edited human babies: Multiple discourses of gene editing on social media'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver