TY - JOUR
T1 - Bayesian weighted Mendelian randomization for causal inference based on summary statistics
AU - Zhao, Jia
AU - Ming, Jingsi
AU - Hu, Xianghong
AU - Chen, Gang
AU - Liu, Jin
AU - Yang, Can
N1 - Funding information:
This work was supported in part by the National Science Funding of China [61501389]; the Hong Kong Research Grant Council [12316116, 12301417 and 16307818]; The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology [startup grant R9405, IGN17SC02, and Big Data Bio-Intelligence (BDBI) Lab]; Duke-NUS Medical School 546 WBS [R-913-200-098-263]; Ministry of Education, Singapore. AcRF Tier 2 [MOE2016-T2-2- 547 029, MOE2018-T2-1-046 and MOE2018-T2-2-006].
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press.
PY - 2020/3
Y1 - 2020/3
N2 - Motivation: The results from Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) on thousands of phenotypes provide an unprecedented opportunity to infer the causal effect of one phenotype (exposure) on another (outcome). Mendelian randomization (MR), an instrumental variable (IV) method, has been introduced for causal inference using GWAS data. Due to the polygenic architecture of complex traits/diseases and the ubiquity of pleiotropy, however, MR has many unique challenges compared to conventional IV methods.Results: We propose a Bayesian weighted Mendelian randomization (BWMR) for causal inference to address these challenges. In our BWMR model, the uncertainty of weak effects owing to polygenicity has been taken into account and the violation of IV assumption due to pleiotropy has been addressed through outlier detection by Bayesian weighting. To make the causal inference based on BWMR computationally stable and efficient, we developed a variational expectation-maximization (VEM) algorithm. Moreover, we have also derived an exact closed-form formula to correct the posterior covariance which is often underestimated in variational inference. Through comprehensive simulation studies, we evaluated the performance of BWMR, demonstrating the advantage of BWMR over its competitors. Then we applied BWMR to make causal inference between 130 metabolites and 93 complex human traits, uncovering novel causal relationship between exposure and outcome traits.
AB - Motivation: The results from Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) on thousands of phenotypes provide an unprecedented opportunity to infer the causal effect of one phenotype (exposure) on another (outcome). Mendelian randomization (MR), an instrumental variable (IV) method, has been introduced for causal inference using GWAS data. Due to the polygenic architecture of complex traits/diseases and the ubiquity of pleiotropy, however, MR has many unique challenges compared to conventional IV methods.Results: We propose a Bayesian weighted Mendelian randomization (BWMR) for causal inference to address these challenges. In our BWMR model, the uncertainty of weak effects owing to polygenicity has been taken into account and the violation of IV assumption due to pleiotropy has been addressed through outlier detection by Bayesian weighting. To make the causal inference based on BWMR computationally stable and efficient, we developed a variational expectation-maximization (VEM) algorithm. Moreover, we have also derived an exact closed-form formula to correct the posterior covariance which is often underestimated in variational inference. Through comprehensive simulation studies, we evaluated the performance of BWMR, demonstrating the advantage of BWMR over its competitors. Then we applied BWMR to make causal inference between 130 metabolites and 93 complex human traits, uncovering novel causal relationship between exposure and outcome traits.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85081737169&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz749
DO - 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz749
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 31593215
AN - SCOPUS:85081737169
SN - 1367-4803
VL - 36
SP - 1501
EP - 1508
JO - Bioinformatics
JF - Bioinformatics
IS - 5
ER -