Abstract
This research investigates the role of science education in countering climate misinformation, focusing on its effects on both skeptics and believers. It assesses two forms of literacy: cognitive science literacy, which addresses biases in processing scientific information, and civic science literacy, which involves understanding the scientific principles and methods that enable informed decision-making and effectively participating in civic and societal discussions. Results from experimental data collected in 2024 (N = 798) showed that different types of science literacy content had a minimal impact on perceptions of misinformation trustworthiness. However, the level of attention given to the educational material significantly influenced its effectiveness, with this effect being moderated by participants’ pre-existing attitudes. Specifically, increased attention reduced trust in misinformation among climate believers, but not among skeptics. These findings underscore the importance of designing science education interventions that capture attention and align with the audience’s predispositions, thereby enhancing their effectiveness.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 411-425 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | International Journal of Science Education, Part B: Communication and Public Engagement |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Early online date | 12 Jan 2026 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 3 Jul 2026 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 4 Quality Education
User-Defined Keywords
- Science literacy
- misinformation
- online education
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Attention over content: evaluating the effectiveness of science education in countering climate misinformation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver