Anticipation, abduction and the economy of research: The normative stance

Daniele Chiffi, Ahti Veikko Pietarinen, Marika Proover*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

    18 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Anticipation operates under abductive modes of reasoning. Anticipatory abduction is normative and appeals to principles of the economy of research. As a defeasible mode of reasoning, abduction copes with fundamental uncertainty of the future in rational, logical and anticipatory manners. Abduction arises from the mind’s ability to perceive logical and counterfactual relationships. This perceptual experience (i) happens on an interval, (ii) is linked to the past and (iii) is proactively and continually future-oriented. Since anticipation refers not only to reasoning about future but also to exploiting future in our present action, abduction alone would only partially explain anticipation. For this reason, we integrate it with normative facets that derive from the theory of the economy of research and the pragmatistic interpretation of abduction, as a relation between a hope that hypotheses materialize in a certain way and our decisions to act upon those hypotheses. This proposed unification of abduction, economy of research and pragmatism provides a complete Peircean methodology that can recover anticipation from its logical and pragmatistic roots.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number102471
    JournalFutures
    Volume115
    Early online date4 Oct 2019
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jan 2020

    Scopus Subject Areas

    • Business and International Management
    • Development
    • Sociology and Political Science

    User-Defined Keywords

    • Abduction
    • Anticipation
    • Economy of research
    • Fundamental uncertainty
    • Normativity
    • Pragmatism

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Anticipation, abduction and the economy of research: The normative stance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this