TY - JOUR
T1 - Anticipation, abduction and the economy of research
T2 - The normative stance
AU - Chiffi, Daniele
AU - Pietarinen, Ahti Veikko
AU - Proover, Marika
N1 - Funding Information:
Supported by Estonian Research Council (PUT1305 Abduction in the Age of Fundamental Uncertainty), the framework of the HSE University Basic Research Program funded by the Russian Academic Excellence Project '5-100', Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research (Excellence Schema, Project “Fragilità Territoriali”, L. 232/2016) and Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (PTDC/MHC-FIL/0521/2014 Values in Argumentative Discourse). We thank the audience of Anticipation 2017 Conference and the anonymous referees for their remarks that helped us to clarify some points in the earlier version of the paper.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
PY - 2020/1
Y1 - 2020/1
N2 - Anticipation operates under abductive modes of reasoning. Anticipatory abduction is normative and appeals to principles of the economy of research. As a defeasible mode of reasoning, abduction copes with fundamental uncertainty of the future in rational, logical and anticipatory manners. Abduction arises from the mind’s ability to perceive logical and counterfactual relationships. This perceptual experience (i) happens on an interval, (ii) is linked to the past and (iii) is proactively and continually future-oriented. Since anticipation refers not only to reasoning about future but also to exploiting future in our present action, abduction alone would only partially explain anticipation. For this reason, we integrate it with normative facets that derive from the theory of the economy of research and the pragmatistic interpretation of abduction, as a relation between a hope that hypotheses materialize in a certain way and our decisions to act upon those hypotheses. This proposed unification of abduction, economy of research and pragmatism provides a complete Peircean methodology that can recover anticipation from its logical and pragmatistic roots.
AB - Anticipation operates under abductive modes of reasoning. Anticipatory abduction is normative and appeals to principles of the economy of research. As a defeasible mode of reasoning, abduction copes with fundamental uncertainty of the future in rational, logical and anticipatory manners. Abduction arises from the mind’s ability to perceive logical and counterfactual relationships. This perceptual experience (i) happens on an interval, (ii) is linked to the past and (iii) is proactively and continually future-oriented. Since anticipation refers not only to reasoning about future but also to exploiting future in our present action, abduction alone would only partially explain anticipation. For this reason, we integrate it with normative facets that derive from the theory of the economy of research and the pragmatistic interpretation of abduction, as a relation between a hope that hypotheses materialize in a certain way and our decisions to act upon those hypotheses. This proposed unification of abduction, economy of research and pragmatism provides a complete Peircean methodology that can recover anticipation from its logical and pragmatistic roots.
KW - Abduction
KW - Anticipation
KW - Economy of research
KW - Fundamental uncertainty
KW - Normativity
KW - Pragmatism
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074126587&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.futures.2019.102471
DO - 10.1016/j.futures.2019.102471
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85074126587
SN - 0016-3287
VL - 115
JO - Futures
JF - Futures
M1 - 102471
ER -