TY - JOUR
T1 - Anaerobic mono-digestion and co-digestion of food waste and mixed sewage sludge
T2 - A comparative analysis of metabolic patterns and taxonomic profiles
AU - Luo, Lijun
AU - Pradhan, Nirakar
N1 - Funding information (Session Snippet):
This work was supported by the Hong Kong Baptist University with grant number RC-OFSGT2/20-21/SCI/010.
Publisher copyright:
© 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024/6/1
Y1 - 2024/6/1
N2 - This study systematically compares the anaerobic mono-digestion and co-digestion of food waste (FW) and sewage sludge to understand the effects of feedstock composition on biogas yield and microbial community structure. The results showed that FW mono-digestion is optimal for methane production, achieving a peak yield of 377.25 ± 29.55 mL/g volatile solids fed (VSfed) but also generated significant quantities of hydrogen (151.59 ± 1.35 mL H2/g VS) during initial hydrolysis and acidogenesis phases. In contrast, waste-activated sludge (WAS) mono-digestion results in significantly lower methane yields (206.63 ± 1.18 mL/g VSfed). However, co-digesting FW with WAS enhances process stability, reducing the lag phase duration, albeit with an 8 % decrease in methane production relative to the theoretical potential. Further, it was observed when WAS was co-digested with primary sludge (PS), leading to a 34 % increase in methane yield compared to WAS mono-digestion. Soluble protein breakdown was highly efficient in WAS and PS treatments, exceeding 80 %, while FW treatments achieved less than 14 % degradation. Taxonomic analysis revealed a dominance of Firmicutes, specifically Clostridium sensu stricto 1, in FW reactors, whereas WAS and PS reactors supported a more diverse microbial community structure. Enzyme analysis indicated an upward trend in cellulase activity in WAS and PS reactors over time. These insights emphasize the importance of selecting appropriate feedstock combinations to enhance methane production, offering a pathway to more efficient anaerobic digestion processes and improved biogas recovery from organic waste.
AB - This study systematically compares the anaerobic mono-digestion and co-digestion of food waste (FW) and sewage sludge to understand the effects of feedstock composition on biogas yield and microbial community structure. The results showed that FW mono-digestion is optimal for methane production, achieving a peak yield of 377.25 ± 29.55 mL/g volatile solids fed (VSfed) but also generated significant quantities of hydrogen (151.59 ± 1.35 mL H2/g VS) during initial hydrolysis and acidogenesis phases. In contrast, waste-activated sludge (WAS) mono-digestion results in significantly lower methane yields (206.63 ± 1.18 mL/g VSfed). However, co-digesting FW with WAS enhances process stability, reducing the lag phase duration, albeit with an 8 % decrease in methane production relative to the theoretical potential. Further, it was observed when WAS was co-digested with primary sludge (PS), leading to a 34 % increase in methane yield compared to WAS mono-digestion. Soluble protein breakdown was highly efficient in WAS and PS treatments, exceeding 80 %, while FW treatments achieved less than 14 % degradation. Taxonomic analysis revealed a dominance of Firmicutes, specifically Clostridium sensu stricto 1, in FW reactors, whereas WAS and PS reactors supported a more diverse microbial community structure. Enzyme analysis indicated an upward trend in cellulase activity in WAS and PS reactors over time. These insights emphasize the importance of selecting appropriate feedstock combinations to enhance methane production, offering a pathway to more efficient anaerobic digestion processes and improved biogas recovery from organic waste.
KW - Anaerobic co-digestion
KW - Biogas production
KW - Biowaste-to-bioenergy conversion
KW - Enzymatic activity
KW - Metabolic interactions
KW - Microbial community analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85190744726&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cej.2024.151397
DO - 10.1016/j.cej.2024.151397
M3 - Journal article
SN - 1385-8947
VL - 489
JO - Chemical Engineering Journal
JF - Chemical Engineering Journal
M1 - 151397
ER -