Abstract
Our study seeks to explain bystander inaction by guiding the regulation of delegitimizing doxing. We develop a contextualized research model by integrating attitudinal ambivalence theory and general deterrence theory. Our results innovatively uncover three congruence effects describing how positive and negative appraisals are combined to determine bystander inaction. Moreover, perceived SNS deterrence weakens the negative impact of attitudinal univalence on bystander inaction. As one of the pioneering empirical inquiries into delegitimizing doxing, our study contributes to theory and practice related to bystander intervention in delegitimizing doxing.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 104118 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Information and Management |
| Volume | 62 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Apr 2025 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
User-Defined Keywords
- Attitudinal ambivalence
- Bystander effect
- Cyberbullying
- Doxing
- General deterrence theory
- Polynomial regression and response surface analysis
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'An integrated model of ambivalence and deterrence of bystander inaction in delegitimizing doxing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver