TY - JOUR
T1 - An fMRI study on sunk cost effect
AU - Zeng, Jianmin
AU - Zhang, Qinglin
AU - Chen, Changming
AU - Yu, Rongjun
AU - Gong, Qiyong
N1 - Funding information:
This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (a grant awarded to Jianmin Zeng in 2013), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81030027), and Major Program of National Social Science Foundation of China (No. 11&ZD088).
Publisher copyright:
© 2013 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2013/6/26
Y1 - 2013/6/26
N2 - Sunk cost effect (also called escalation of commitment, etc) is a pervasive, interesting and famous decision bias, which has been intensively discussed in psychology, economics, management, political science, zoology, etc. To date, little has been known about the neural basis of this phenomenon. We investigated it by using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to monitor healthy subjects' brain activities when they made decisions in a task wherein sunk cost and incremental cost were systematically manipulated. Higher sunk cost only increased activity of some brain areas (mainly lateral frontal and parietal cortices, which are involved in risk-taking), whereas lower incremental cost mainly increased activity of some brain areas (including striatum and medial prefrontal cortex, which are sensitive to rewards). No overlapping brain areas were found to respond to both sunk cost and incremental cost. These results favor certainty effect over self-justification or diminishing sensitivity as account of sunk cost effect.
AB - Sunk cost effect (also called escalation of commitment, etc) is a pervasive, interesting and famous decision bias, which has been intensively discussed in psychology, economics, management, political science, zoology, etc. To date, little has been known about the neural basis of this phenomenon. We investigated it by using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to monitor healthy subjects' brain activities when they made decisions in a task wherein sunk cost and incremental cost were systematically manipulated. Higher sunk cost only increased activity of some brain areas (mainly lateral frontal and parietal cortices, which are involved in risk-taking), whereas lower incremental cost mainly increased activity of some brain areas (including striatum and medial prefrontal cortex, which are sensitive to rewards). No overlapping brain areas were found to respond to both sunk cost and incremental cost. These results favor certainty effect over self-justification or diminishing sensitivity as account of sunk cost effect.
KW - Decision making
KW - Escalation of commitment
KW - FMRI
KW - Neuroeconomics
KW - Prospect theory
KW - Sunk cost effect
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84878747683&partnerID=MN8TOARS
U2 - 10.1016/j.brainres.2013.05.001
DO - 10.1016/j.brainres.2013.05.001
M3 - Journal article
SN - 0006-8993
VL - 1519
SP - 63
EP - 70
JO - Brain Research
JF - Brain Research
ER -