Ambivalent bosses: An examination of supervisor expressed emotional ambivalence on subordinate task engagement

Jia Hui Lim*, Kenneth Tai, Maryam Kouchaki

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    6 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Supervisors often have to manage conflicting and contradictory demands in increasingly dynamic work environments. In the process of doing so, they may express emotional ambivalence observed by subordinates. Drawing on emotions as social information (EASI) theory and research on unpredictability and stress, we examine when and why supervisor expressed emotional ambivalence influence subordinate outcomes. In two studies, we find that supervisor expressed emotional ambivalence is indirectly related to subordinate task engagement via supervisor unpredictability (Studies 1 and 2). In addition, supervisor unpredictability and anticipated stress serially mediate the effect of supervisor expressed emotional ambivalence on task engagement (Studies 3 and 4). Furthermore, the target of supervisor expressed emotional ambivalence moderates this indirect effect, such that the negative indirect effect is stronger for a subordinate when supervisor expressed emotional ambivalence is directed toward him/her as opposed to another subordinate (Study 4). We discuss the theoretical and practical implications of our findings.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)139-152
    Number of pages14
    JournalOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
    Volume165
    Early online date28 May 2021
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jul 2021

    Scopus Subject Areas

    • Applied Psychology
    • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

    User-Defined Keywords

    • Anticipated stress
    • Emotional ambivalence
    • Emotions
    • Target of expressed emotional ambivalence
    • Task engagement
    • Unpredictability

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Ambivalent bosses: An examination of supervisor expressed emotional ambivalence on subordinate task engagement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this