Adrenomedullin increased the short-circuit current in the pig oviduct through chloride channels via the CGRP receptor: Mediation by cAMP and calcium ions but not by nitric oxide

S.B. Liao, King-Ho Cheung, M.P.L. Cheung, Y.T. To, W.S. O, F. Tang*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The oviduct serves as a site for the fertilization of the ovum and the transport of the conceptus down to the uterus for implantation. In this study, we investigated the presence of adrenomedullin (ADM) and its receptor component proteins in the pig oviduct. The effect of ADM on oviductal secretion, the specific receptor, and the mechanisms involved were also investigated. The presence of ADM and its receptor component proteins in the pig oviduct were confirmed using immunostaining. Short-circuit current (I(sc)) technique was employed to study chloride ion secretion in the oviductal epithelium. ADM increased I(sc) through cAMP- and calcium-activated chloride channels, and this effect could be inhibited by the CGRP receptor antagonist, hCGRP8-37. In contrast, the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor, L-NG-nitroarginine methyl ester (L-NAME), could not block the effect of ADM on I(sc). In summary, ADM may increase oviductal fluid secretion via chloride secretion independent of the nitric oxide pathway for the transport of sperm and the conceptus.
Original languageEnglish
Article number99
Number of pages6
JournalBiology of Reproduction
Volume89
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2013

User-Defined Keywords

  • adrenal medulla
  • calcium
  • chloride channel
  • cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP)
  • ion channels
  • nitric oxide pathway
  • oviduct
  • short-circuit current

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Adrenomedullin increased the short-circuit current in the pig oviduct through chloride channels via the CGRP receptor: Mediation by cAMP and calcium ions but not by nitric oxide'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this