Abstract
In 2011, the leaders of the nations that share Queen Elizabeth as their head of state agreed to change the rules governing the inheritance of the throne. The federal nature of the Canadian and Australian Crowns raises the question of whether Canadian provinces and Australian states should be involved in the process for modifying the rules of succession. Australia's federal government has decided to include its states in the process, whereas Canada's did not. This article will assess what the differences between these two approaches reveal about the political cultures and leaders of these nations. The issues discussed include relations between the civil service and elected politicians, the contested social memory of the British Empire, and the relationship between neoliberalism and cooperative federalism.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 376-401 |
Number of pages | 26 |
Journal | Commonwealth and Comparative Politics |
Volume | 52 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jul 2014 |
Scopus Subject Areas
- Sociology and Political Science
- Political Science and International Relations
User-Defined Keywords
- Australia
- Canada
- federalism
- Julia Gillard
- monarchy
- Stephen Harper