A study of the occurrence and potential risks of microplastics in fish and shellfish of Hong Kong

Jie Zeng, Xueying Huang, Ho-Kit Leung, Yi Wang*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Abstract

Microplastic pollution has been recognized as a significant problem in Hong Kong. Microplastics contained in the marine environment and aquatic products can accumulate in the human body through the food chain and cause adverse effects. However, the risks associated with the consumption of aquatic products have not yet been fully elucidated. This study assessed the microplastic contamination in 9 different commercial fish and shellfish from Hong Kong. Microplastic particles were found in both organ and flesh samples, where higher concentrations were found in the organs. Among all the species we tested, mussel exhibited the highest microplastic content in the flesh. The dominant types of microplastics detected were polystyrene (PS) and polyethylene (PE), which were commonly used in disposable food packaging. Cell models were used to evaluated the potential toxicity of the MPs. It was found that the integrity of intestinal barrier remained unaffected, while MPs in geoduck and mussel showed higher cytotoxicity with increased necrotic rate of intestinal cell. Besides, MPs from mussel exhibited the highest hemolytic activity, posing a potential risk to red blood cells. These findings highlighted the presence of MP contamination in fish and shellfish of Hong Kong and its potential risks to human health.
Original languageEnglish
Article number107549
Number of pages31
JournalMarine Environmental Research
Volume212
Early online date12 Sept 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2025

User-Defined Keywords

  • Digestive progress
  • Fish
  • Human health
  • Microplastic pollution
  • Shellfish

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A study of the occurrence and potential risks of microplastics in fish and shellfish of Hong Kong'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this