A Response to John Frame’s Presuppositional Approach to Faith and Reason

Andrew Ter Ern Loke

doi:10.1163/15697312-01204008

A Response to John Frame’s Presuppositional Approach to Faith and Reason

Andrew Ter Ern Loke^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

Abstract

Presuppositionalism is popular among certain groups of Reformed Christians today, and John Frame is one of its leading proponents. In contrast with the Evidential Approach concerning faith and reason, which affirms experiences and reason as starting points, Presuppositionalists assume the truth of scripture as starting point in their assessment of the truth-claims of Christianity. They appeal to Christians by emphasizing the authority of scripture, by criticizing autonomous human reason, and by highlighting the noetic effects of sin. I address these considerations, show that Frame's approach is self-defeating and unacceptably circular, and answer his objections to the Evidential Approach.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	356-376
Number of pages	21
Journal	Journal of Reformed Theology
Volume	12
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1163/15697312-01204008
Publication status	Published - Dec 2018

Scopus Subject Areas

Religious studies

User-Defined Keywords

authority of scripture
faith and reason
noetic effects of sin
Presuppositionalism
theological presuppositions

Access to Document

10.1163/15697312-01204008

Cite this

@article{f622519e6fc04d328991a9d5d1806573,

title = "A Response to John Frame{\textquoteright}s Presuppositional Approach to Faith and Reason",

abstract = "Presuppositionalism is popular among certain groups of Reformed Christians today, and John Frame is one of its leading proponents. In contrast with the Evidential Approach concerning faith and reason, which affirms experiences and reason as starting points, Presuppositionalists assume the truth of scripture as starting point in their assessment of the truth-claims of Christianity. They appeal to Christians by emphasizing the authority of scripture, by criticizing autonomous human reason, and by highlighting the noetic effects of sin. I address these considerations, show that Frame's approach is self-defeating and unacceptably circular, and answer his objections to the Evidential Approach.",

keywords = "authority of scripture, faith and reason, noetic effects of sin, Presuppositionalism, theological presuppositions",

author = "Loke, {Andrew Ter Ern}",

year = "2018",

month = dec,

doi = "10.1163/15697312-01204008",

language = "English",

volume = "12",

pages = "356--376",

journal = "Journal of Reformed Theology",

issn = "1872-5163",

publisher = "Brill Academic Publishers",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Response to John Frame’s Presuppositional Approach to Faith and Reason

AU - Loke, Andrew Ter Ern

PY - 2018/12

Y1 - 2018/12

N2 - Presuppositionalism is popular among certain groups of Reformed Christians today, and John Frame is one of its leading proponents. In contrast with the Evidential Approach concerning faith and reason, which affirms experiences and reason as starting points, Presuppositionalists assume the truth of scripture as starting point in their assessment of the truth-claims of Christianity. They appeal to Christians by emphasizing the authority of scripture, by criticizing autonomous human reason, and by highlighting the noetic effects of sin. I address these considerations, show that Frame's approach is self-defeating and unacceptably circular, and answer his objections to the Evidential Approach.

AB - Presuppositionalism is popular among certain groups of Reformed Christians today, and John Frame is one of its leading proponents. In contrast with the Evidential Approach concerning faith and reason, which affirms experiences and reason as starting points, Presuppositionalists assume the truth of scripture as starting point in their assessment of the truth-claims of Christianity. They appeal to Christians by emphasizing the authority of scripture, by criticizing autonomous human reason, and by highlighting the noetic effects of sin. I address these considerations, show that Frame's approach is self-defeating and unacceptably circular, and answer his objections to the Evidential Approach.

KW - authority of scripture

KW - faith and reason

KW - noetic effects of sin

KW - Presuppositionalism

KW - theological presuppositions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059360107&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1163/15697312-01204008

DO - 10.1163/15697312-01204008

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85059360107

SN - 1872-5163

VL - 12

SP - 356

EP - 376

JO - Journal of Reformed Theology

JF - Journal of Reformed Theology

IS - 4

ER -

A Response to John Frame’s Presuppositional Approach to Faith and Reason

Abstract

Scopus Subject Areas

User-Defined Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this