A New Fourfold Taxonomy of Science-Religion Relations

Andrew Loke*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Despite various criticisms and alternative proposals, Barbour’s fourfold taxonomy has continued to serve as an intuitive introduction to Science-Religion relations. I offer a new fourfold taxonomy—called the Four “C”s Taxonomy: Conflict, Compartmentalization, Conversation, and Convergence—which improves upon the pedagogical advantages of Barbour’s taxonomy, and which avoids the weaknesses of alternative taxonomies. In addition, the new taxonomy addresses the objections against Barbour’s taxonomy by distinguishing different aspects of science and religion as the relata, by clarifying the relations as perceived/expressed relations, and by demonstrating their relevance for the explanation of history and of other cultures.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)29-43
    Number of pages15
    JournalTheology and Science
    Volume21
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2 Jan 2023

    User-Defined Keywords

    • Ian Barbour
    • taxonomy
    • science-religion relations
    • conflict
    • compartmentalization
    • conversation
    • convergence

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A New Fourfold Taxonomy of Science-Religion Relations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this