TY - JOUR
T1 - A Morphometric Analysis of Commonly Used Craniometric Approaches for Freehand Ventriculoperitoneal Shunting
AU - Woo, Peter Y. M.
AU - Wong, Desiree K. K.
AU - Yuan, Yixuan
AU - Guo, Xiaoqing
AU - See, Michael K. W.
AU - Tam, Matthew
AU - Wong, Alain K. S.
AU - Chan, Kwong Yau
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2021. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022/2
Y1 - 2022/2
N2 - BACKGROUND: Ventricular catheter tip position is a predictor for ventriculoperitoneal shunt survival. Cannulation is often performed freehand, but there is limited consensus on the best craniometric approach.OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of localizing craniometric entry sites and to identify which is associated with optimal catheter placement.METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of adult patients who underwent ventriculoperitoneal shunting. The approaches were categorized as Kocher's, Keen's, Frazier's and Dandy's points as well as the parieto-occipital point. An accurately sited burr hole was within 10 mm from standard descriptions. Optimal catheter tip position was defined as within the ipsilateral frontal horn.RESULTS: A total of 110 patients were reviewed, and 58% (65/110) of burr holes were accurately sited. Keen's point was the most correctly identified (65%, 11/17), followed by Kocher's point (65%, 37/57) and Frazier's point (60%, 3/5). Predictors for accurate localization were Keen's point (odds ratio 0.3; 95% CI: 01-0.9) and right-sided access (odds ratio 0.4; 95% CI: 0.1-0.9). Sixty-three percent (69/110) of catheters were optimally placed with Keen's point (adjusted odds ratio 0.04; 95% CI: 0.01-0.67), being the only independent factor. Thirteen patients (12%) required shunt revision at a mean duration of 10 ± 25 mo. Suboptimal catheter tip position was the only independent determinant for revision (adjusted odds ratio 0.11; 95% CI: 0.01-0.98).CONCLUSION: This is the first study to compare the accuracy of freehand ventricular cannulation of standard craniometric entry sites for adult patients. Keen's point was the most accurately sited and was a predictor for optimal catheter position. Catheter tip location, not the entry site, predicted shunt survival.
AB - BACKGROUND: Ventricular catheter tip position is a predictor for ventriculoperitoneal shunt survival. Cannulation is often performed freehand, but there is limited consensus on the best craniometric approach.OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of localizing craniometric entry sites and to identify which is associated with optimal catheter placement.METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of adult patients who underwent ventriculoperitoneal shunting. The approaches were categorized as Kocher's, Keen's, Frazier's and Dandy's points as well as the parieto-occipital point. An accurately sited burr hole was within 10 mm from standard descriptions. Optimal catheter tip position was defined as within the ipsilateral frontal horn.RESULTS: A total of 110 patients were reviewed, and 58% (65/110) of burr holes were accurately sited. Keen's point was the most correctly identified (65%, 11/17), followed by Kocher's point (65%, 37/57) and Frazier's point (60%, 3/5). Predictors for accurate localization were Keen's point (odds ratio 0.3; 95% CI: 01-0.9) and right-sided access (odds ratio 0.4; 95% CI: 0.1-0.9). Sixty-three percent (69/110) of catheters were optimally placed with Keen's point (adjusted odds ratio 0.04; 95% CI: 0.01-0.67), being the only independent factor. Thirteen patients (12%) required shunt revision at a mean duration of 10 ± 25 mo. Suboptimal catheter tip position was the only independent determinant for revision (adjusted odds ratio 0.11; 95% CI: 0.01-0.98).CONCLUSION: This is the first study to compare the accuracy of freehand ventricular cannulation of standard craniometric entry sites for adult patients. Keen's point was the most accurately sited and was a predictor for optimal catheter position. Catheter tip location, not the entry site, predicted shunt survival.
KW - Craniometric entry site
KW - Morphometric analysis
KW - Ventriculoperitoneal shunting
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85123461154&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1227/ONS.0000000000000047
DO - 10.1227/ONS.0000000000000047
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 35007256
AN - SCOPUS:85123461154
SN - 2332-4252
VL - 22
SP - 51
EP - 60
JO - Operative Neurosurgery
JF - Operative Neurosurgery
IS - 2
ER -