TY - JOUR
T1 - A Comparison of Methods for Estimating the Determinant of High-Dimensional Covariance Matrix
AU - Hu, Zongliang
AU - Dong, Kai
AU - Dai, Wenlin
AU - TONG, Tiejun
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgment: Tiejun Tong’s research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China grant (No. 11671338), and the Hong Kong Baptist University grants FRG2/15-16/019, FRG2/15-16/038 and FRG1/16-17/018. The authors thank the editor, the associate editor and two reviewers for their constructive comments that have led to a substantial improvement of the paper.
PY - 2017/11/27
Y1 - 2017/11/27
N2 - The determinant of the covariance matrix for high-dimensional data plays an important role in statistical inference and decision. It has many real applications including statistical tests and information theory. Due to the statistical and computational challenges with high dimensionality, little work has been proposed in the literature for estimating the determinant of high-dimensional covariance matrix. In this paper, we estimate the determinant of the covariance matrix using some recent proposals for estimating high-dimensional covariance matrix. Specifically, we consider a total of eight covariance matrix estimation methods for comparison. Through extensive simulation studies, we explore and summarize some interesting comparison results among all compared methods. We also provide practical guidelines based on the sample size, the dimension, and the correlation of the data set for estimating the determinant of high-dimensional covariance matrix. Finally, from a perspective of the loss function, the comparison study in this paper may also serve as a proxy to assess the performance of the covariance matrix estimation.
AB - The determinant of the covariance matrix for high-dimensional data plays an important role in statistical inference and decision. It has many real applications including statistical tests and information theory. Due to the statistical and computational challenges with high dimensionality, little work has been proposed in the literature for estimating the determinant of high-dimensional covariance matrix. In this paper, we estimate the determinant of the covariance matrix using some recent proposals for estimating high-dimensional covariance matrix. Specifically, we consider a total of eight covariance matrix estimation methods for comparison. Through extensive simulation studies, we explore and summarize some interesting comparison results among all compared methods. We also provide practical guidelines based on the sample size, the dimension, and the correlation of the data set for estimating the determinant of high-dimensional covariance matrix. Finally, from a perspective of the loss function, the comparison study in this paper may also serve as a proxy to assess the performance of the covariance matrix estimation.
KW - covariance matrix
KW - high-dimensional data
KW - log-determinant,sparse matrix
KW - shrinkage estimation
KW - thresholding estimation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85035014152&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1515/ijb-2017-0013
DO - 10.1515/ijb-2017-0013
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 28953454
AN - SCOPUS:85035014152
SN - 1557-4679
VL - 13
JO - International Journal of Biostatistics
JF - International Journal of Biostatistics
IS - 2
M1 - 20170013
ER -