A CO-LIBERATORY FRAMEWORK FOR BIG DATA

Matthew Kuan Johnson; Rachel Siow Robertson

doi:10.1111/zygo.12880

A CO-LIBERATORY FRAMEWORK FOR BIG DATA

Matthew Kuan Johnson^*, Rachel Siow Robertson^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Academy of Chinese, History, Religion and Philosophy

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › peer-review

Abstract

This article provides an account of the ethical issues that arise when digital technologies and online spaces are structured by Big Data algorithms. We show that although the uses of Big Data may be new, traditional theological and ethical categories are still applicable, including “the sins of the fathers” from hamartiology and the scholastic concept of haecceity. Using these resources, we map the overall ecosystem in which digital technologies are developed and used, identifying the relationships between the individuals and organizations involved. We show how these relationships are often characterized by various kinds of harm. We then argue for a reorientation of the tech ecosystem toward co-liberation—and ultimately, joy.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	749-769
Number of pages	21
Journal	Zygon
Volume	58
Issue number	3
Early online date	2 Apr 2023
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/zygo.12880
Publication status	Published - Sept 2023

User-Defined Keywords

AI ethics
big data
co-liberation
design
haecceity
hamartiology
joy
sins of the fathers
virtue theory

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1111/zygo.12880

Cite this

@article{72db0082541d40c58b6a47e2f228029e,

title = "A CO-LIBERATORY FRAMEWORK FOR BIG DATA",

abstract = "This article provides an account of the ethical issues that arise when digital technologies and online spaces are structured by Big Data algorithms. We show that although the uses of Big Data may be new, traditional theological and ethical categories are still applicable, including “the sins of the fathers” from hamartiology and the scholastic concept of haecceity. Using these resources, we map the overall ecosystem in which digital technologies are developed and used, identifying the relationships between the individuals and organizations involved. We show how these relationships are often characterized by various kinds of harm. We then argue for a reorientation of the tech ecosystem toward co-liberation—and ultimately, joy.",

keywords = "AI ethics, big data, co-liberation, design, haecceity, hamartiology, joy, sins of the fathers, virtue theory",

author = "Johnson, {Matthew Kuan} and Robertson, {Rachel Siow}",

note = "Funding Information: The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for theresearch, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The authors{\textquoteright} workon this publication was made possible through the support of grants fromthe John Templeton Foundation. The opinions expressed in this publica-tion are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of theJohn Templeton Foundation. Publisher copyright: {\textcopyright} 2023 The Authors. Zygon{\textregistered} published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Joint Publication Board of Zygon.",

year = "2023",

month = sep,

doi = "10.1111/zygo.12880",

language = "English",

volume = "58",

pages = "749--769",

journal = "Zygon",

issn = "0591-2385",

publisher = "Open Library of Humanities",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A CO-LIBERATORY FRAMEWORK FOR BIG DATA

AU - Johnson, Matthew Kuan

AU - Robertson, Rachel Siow

N1 - Funding Information: The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for theresearch, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The authors’ workon this publication was made possible through the support of grants fromthe John Templeton Foundation. The opinions expressed in this publica-tion are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of theJohn Templeton Foundation. Publisher copyright: © 2023 The Authors. Zygon® published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Joint Publication Board of Zygon.

PY - 2023/9

Y1 - 2023/9

N2 - This article provides an account of the ethical issues that arise when digital technologies and online spaces are structured by Big Data algorithms. We show that although the uses of Big Data may be new, traditional theological and ethical categories are still applicable, including “the sins of the fathers” from hamartiology and the scholastic concept of haecceity. Using these resources, we map the overall ecosystem in which digital technologies are developed and used, identifying the relationships between the individuals and organizations involved. We show how these relationships are often characterized by various kinds of harm. We then argue for a reorientation of the tech ecosystem toward co-liberation—and ultimately, joy.

AB - This article provides an account of the ethical issues that arise when digital technologies and online spaces are structured by Big Data algorithms. We show that although the uses of Big Data may be new, traditional theological and ethical categories are still applicable, including “the sins of the fathers” from hamartiology and the scholastic concept of haecceity. Using these resources, we map the overall ecosystem in which digital technologies are developed and used, identifying the relationships between the individuals and organizations involved. We show how these relationships are often characterized by various kinds of harm. We then argue for a reorientation of the tech ecosystem toward co-liberation—and ultimately, joy.

KW - AI ethics

KW - big data

KW - co-liberation

KW - design

KW - haecceity

KW - hamartiology

KW - joy

KW - sins of the fathers

KW - virtue theory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85152050425&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/zygo.12880

DO - 10.1111/zygo.12880

M3 - Journal article

SN - 0591-2385

VL - 58

SP - 749

EP - 769

JO - Zygon

JF - Zygon

IS - 3

ER -

A CO-LIBERATORY FRAMEWORK FOR BIG DATA

Abstract

User-Defined Keywords

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this