A brief note on the validity and reliability of the rating of perceived exertion scale in monitoring exercise intensity among chinese older adults in Hong Kong

Pak-Kwong Chung*, Yanan Zhao, Jingdong Liu, Binh Quach

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

    28 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This study examined the validity and reliability of the Cantonese Borg 6-20 Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) scale in monitoring exercise intensity among Chinese older adults. A total of 40 apparently healthy older adults (16 men, 24 women; M age = 69.8 yr., SD = 4.56) performed two trials of three intermittent exercise tests administered in random order using the cycle ergometer. Results revealed significant differences of RPE, HR, and VO2 between different workloads, and there were moderate to high correlations between RPE and HR and VO2, respectively. Results also found moderate consistency of RPE between Trial 1 and Trial 2. These indicated that the Cantonese 6–20 RPE scale can be used as a valid and reliable tool for monitoring exercise intensity among the Chinese older adults.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)805-809
    Number of pages5
    JournalPerceptual and Motor Skills
    Volume121
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Dec 2015

    Scopus Subject Areas

    • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
    • Sensory Systems

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A brief note on the validity and reliability of the rating of perceived exertion scale in monitoring exercise intensity among chinese older adults in Hong Kong'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this